Compliance Audit
AI governance audit — keep your Article 26 posture defensible.
What you get
An audit posture that survives inspection.
- →
Compliance audit report
A structured assessment of your AI governance posture against Article 26 requirements, including documentation gaps, process weaknesses, and control deficiencies.
- →
Gap-to-requirement map
Each identified gap linked to the specific regulatory requirement it violates, with the severity and remediation complexity assessed.
- →
Remediation prioritisation
A ranked action list for closing compliance gaps, sequenced by regulatory risk and effort, ready to be handed to a delivery team.
Who it's for
The regulatory risk owner.
Accountable for regulatory risk. Needs an independent view of where Article 26 compliance posture is weak before the regulator conducts their own review.
Responsible for compliance programme. Needs AI governance included in the compliance cycle with documented evidence of controls.
Managing legal exposure. Needs documented evidence of Article 26 compliance efforts that can be presented to a regulator or court.
Deadline: December 2027. Article 26 of the EU AI Act becomes enforceable for high-risk AI deployers on 2 December 2027 — moved from August 2026 by the Digital Omnibus. The obligations are unchanged; organisations that build now carry no scramble into the deadline.
What comes next
From audit to readiness.
Readiness Sprint
→Close the gaps the audit identified. Four weeks from gap to audit-ready.
KNF Playbook
→For Polish financial institutions: sector-specific AI governance aligned to KNF supervisory expectations.
Human Oversight Effectiveness Review
→Verify that your human oversight mechanisms are genuine, not just documented.
Ready to know where your Article 26 compliance posture is exposed?
Every engagement starts with a short conversation. No commitment, just specifics.
Let's talk →