Human Oversight Effectiveness Review
Is your human oversight of AI genuine — or theatre?
What you get
Oversight that works at the moment it matters.
- →
Oversight effectiveness score
Assessment of whether human reviewers in your AI workflows have sufficient information, authority, and time to meaningfully intervene.
- →
Process gap analysis
Specific workflow steps where human oversight is nominal rather than effective: rubber-stamping, missing context, no override mechanism.
- →
Article 14 compliance assessment
Mapping of current oversight arrangements against the specific EU AI Act Article 14 requirements for high-risk AI systems.
Who it's for
The process owner.
Owns the processes where human-AI collaboration happens. Needs to know whether oversight is real or ceremonial.
Accountable for AI deployment. Needs Article 14 compliance documented before auditors test whether human oversight is genuine.
Responsible for risk controls in AI-integrated processes. Needs assurance that human checks are functioning as a real control, not a checkbox.
Deadline: December 2027. Article 26 of the EU AI Act becomes enforceable for high-risk AI deployers on 2 December 2027 — moved from August 2026 by the Digital Omnibus. The obligations are unchanged; organisations that build now carry no scramble into the deadline.
What comes next
From review to compliance.
Ready to verify that your human oversight of AI is genuine?
Every engagement starts with a short conversation. No commitment, just specifics.
Let's talk →